Ex-President Goodluck Jonathan has reacted to ex-governor of Jigawa State, Sule Lamido over his allegation that he traded off Bayelsa’s election to save himself.
Lamido, in an interview with The Sun, said Jonathan betrayed the Peoples Democratic Party in the last governorship election in his state as part of the deal he made with President Muhammadu Buhari to avoid being prosecuted over the Malabu’s deal.
OPL is an oil field in the Niger Delta with about nine billion barrels of crude oil which is estimated to worth half a trillion dollars.
The deal in question involves the award of oil prospecting licence 245 to Malabu and Gas.
Former President Goodluck Jonathan has challenged Sule Lamido, ex-governor of Jigawa State, to prove that he was involved in the Malabu oil deal.
The sale of the deal is one of the most controversial deals which has led several allegations and lawsuits.
In the interview, Lamido claimed Buhari’s government used the Malabu’s deal to blackmail Jonathan into surrendering Bayelsa to the APC in the last governorship election.
“They are holding him by the balls because he (Jonathan) sure knows his problem with Buhari and with this government. And the issue of Malabu, I think, played a key role, I said so. So, the election was won and lost by PDP. PDP history, PDP tradition and Jonathan were behind him. That I can say anywhere because the issue of Malabu is an issue I know very well. I had cause to discuss it with him,” Lamido had said.
However, in a statement the ex-President released through his spokesman, Ikechukwu Eze, Jonathan accused Lamido of lying to Nigerians.
Our attention has been drawn to a Sunday Sun publication of October 25, 2019, in which Alhaji Sule Lamido claimed that former President Dr Goodluck Jonathan traded off the Bayelsa elections to escape being investigated over the controversial Malabu oil deal.
In an interview granted the newspaper, Lamido was quoted to have said: “The leadership of the APC and the government are blackmailing Jonathan and I think I can say it anywhere that he traded this for his freedom.”
Ordinarily, we shouldn’t be responding to an interview of this nature because it is obvious that given his amiable nature, former President Jonathan does not consider the idea of joining issues with individuals on the pages of newspapers decent conduct. We are also well aware of the former President’s belief that truth always has a way of catching up with statements rooted in lies and propaganda, such as this one.
Furthermore, we considered that when former President Jonathan was in office Mr Lamido was one of the governors that worked closely with him.
However, we chose to make this clarification just to set the record straight, especially as a number of the former President’s close associates have been asking questions about the blatant statement credited to Mr Lamido.
We do not know why Mr. Lamido chose to speak as he did, especially with such hostility, contempt and lies against former President Jonathan. However, one thing is clear: In his anger and apparent bile-filled disposition, Mr Lamido, an otherwise astute and erudite politician, obviously dropped the ball by electing not to speak responsibly like a statesman. He came off the interview sounding like a sulking skunk, to whom logic or reason meant nothing. It didn’t matter to him that, as a well-respected member of the society, he shouldn’t make such weighty claims against a former President if he was only guessing as he admitted. Hear him: “And the issue of Malabo, I think, played a key role.” So hugely pathetic!
Seized by some inexplicable resentment, Lamido held on to the lie currently being pushed by few mischief-makers to the effect that former President Jonathan helped the All Progressive Congress (APC) to win the last gubernatorial election in Bayelsa State. Unfortunately, the former Governor jumped into this convenient bandwagon of grovellers without first thinking of the burden of substantiating his claim. What to do? Orchestrate a raft of incongruent drivel of cheap lies to confuse the readers. In one breathe, Lamido alleged that Jonathan worked against his party “because he was very, very angry with (Governor) Dickson,” in another, he claimed that it was “because he (Jonathan) sure knows his problem with Buhari and his government. And the issue of Malabu, I think, played a key role.”
This absurd claim definitely would have gained more traction in the public space if it made any sense. But it didn’t. What, if we may ask Mr Lamido, is the correlation between Jonathan supporting APC because he was angry with Governor Dickson and Jonathan supporting APC to avoid prosecution over Malabu?
Where was Lamido and his ‘Malabu problem’ when Jonathan campaigned vigorously and helped PDP to win Bayelsa governorship election in 2015, under the same President Buhari?
It is important to establish at this point that Mr Lamido probably knows very little about the Malabu case, for which he was not supposed to have commented blindly. In the first place, the Malabu oil block was not given out by Jonathan. It was a deal that was sealed during the time of late head of state, Gen. Sani Abacha. We feel that Mr Lamido is in a position to know that the business of oil exploration has an international dimension, as such, it is clear that it is not only the Nigerian Government that is looking into the Malabu case. If that is the case, he should also have known that there are at least three other countries outside Africa that are investigating the matter. Assuming without conceding that the former President Jonathan is culpable as Lamido alleged, would trade-off deal with the Nigerian Government also free him from blame in other countries like Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States?
His Excellency Goodluck Jonathan is convinced that Mr Lamido’s awkward intervention in this matter was deliberately designed as a form of blackmail. Having tried many other ways to discredit the former President to no avail, Mr Lamido is now scheming to project Malabo as Jonathan’s Achilles heel. Here again, he has failed because the true story of Malabo is already very well known to Nigerians.
Mr Lamido, we believe, is too smart not to realise that when the pot conveniently calls the kettle black, it is a grand design to confuse, deceive and cover up the truth. Lamido served as Governor of Jigawa State for two terms under the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) after which the ruling APC took over his state. Is he then telling Nigerians that he cut a deal with APC, helped the ruling party to procure victory at the polls and take over his state?
The fact is that it is not only in Bayelsa State that the country had experienced such a situation where PDP or even APC had lost elections to another party. Holding Jonathan responsible for PDP’s loss in Bayelsa without first investigating the issues that determined the fate suffered by the party in the state is not only disingenuous but also detrimental to the image and aspirations of the party.
Indeed, Jonathan who is a former deputy Governor and Governor of Bayelsa States, as well as former Vice President and President of this country, is well-loved and respected by his people. However, it will be tantamount to playing God for anybody to expect that the former President should command a vice-like grip on every Bayelsan in all the local government councils in his state.
Rather than cast aspersions and throw shades because of pre-existing animosities and prejudices against the former president, what is expected of party leaders like Mr Lamido is to seek to interrogate whatever went wrong in Bayelsa, to avert a repeat in another state.
We believe that further interrogation of Lamido’s other weird claims is not necessary for this space, lest it gives the unfortunate interview more attention than it deserves. However, we feel that it is important to reiterate, as we have always done, that former President Jonathan did nothing wrong as far as the Malabu deal is concerned. He, therefore, doesn’t need to cut a deal with anybody within or outside Nigeria.
For the umpteenth time, we restate the following facts to proclaim Dr Jonathan’s innocence:
Former President Goodluck Jonathan did not ask for or collect any bribes over the Malabu deal, neither has he been charged for asking or collecting bribes, neither will he ever be charged with asking for or collecting bribes, because such never happened.
The fact remains that as recent national events continue to vindicate former President Jonathan, and as the world continues to celebrate him, those who are insecure will feed such propaganda to their media agents to serve their narrow interests.
We have always made it clear that beyond this wave of conjecture, former President Jonathan was not linked, indicted or charged for collecting any monies as kickbacks or bribes by any law enforcement body the world over.
It bears repeating that the documents relating to the transactions and decisions of the Federal Government on the Malabo issue, during the Jonathan administration, are in the relevant Government offices, where they are accessible.
We would like to point out that all the actions taken by the Jonathan administration concerning activities in the oil industry were legally conducted by relevant Nigerian Government officials and were carried out in the best interest of the country
We call on anyone, including Mr Sule Lamido, who has any shred of evidence linking former President Jonathan to any wrongdoing in the case of the Malabu incident to waste no time in publishing such evidence or forever remain silent.
While we wait for such an impossible task to be undertaken by Mr Lamido and his co-travellers, we would also want to draw their attention to the following fact:
Dr Goodluck Jonathan as an elder statesman is a father figure to all Nigerians. His door is open to all who wish to pay him courtesy visits or seek his counsel. That should not mean that he automatically subscribes to whatever political agenda his visitors subscribe to.
While he was president, former President Jonathan had the largeness of heart to receive then members of the All Progressive Congress at Aso Rock Presidential villa, including Muhammadu Buhari, who he conferred an award on in 2014. Ahead of the last governorship election, most of the gubernatorial aspirants and candidates from different political parties in Bayelsa state visited Jonathan as a father of the state and that is a role the former President will continue to play.
We wish to state categorically, that Dr Jonathan remains a faithful member of the PDP and had no reason to have worked against his political party in the last election. That the PDP lost in the gubernatorial election to APC is unfortunate, but attributing the defeat to the former President is to be gratuitously obsessed with blackmail and red herring.
Finally, Dr Jonathan would want to counsel Mr Lamido and others in his shoes to look at their national passports. They would see that their citizenship in Nigeria. We are first Nigerians before we are members of any political party or social organisation. If Mr Lamido does not know that, then it is a pity. A big pity indeed.